19962013
Isenberg's Paradox
David poses a multiple choice.
"Stratton Sclavos:
(a) cluelessly megalomaniacal
(b) tragically ignorant"
Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, I submit the following as exhibit A. Please read carefully before using your number 2 lead pencil to circle both of the above.
His people were actually handing this out. Compliments indeed. He'll take 'em however he can get 'em I suppose.
See this post as it first appeared on Blogware.
1 comment
Comments are closed - these are kept exactly as they were left.
(name not saved), December 21, 2003
or (c) a lawyer
No offense to lawyers intended. They're trained to take whatever evidence they can find to promote their own (client's) case/benefit and do whatever they can to trash the evidence against them -- for the lawyer in court, becoming (noticeably)convinced by the arguments of the opposition is not an option (in fact, it's misconduct). Some lawyers find they get ahead applying this method outside of the practice of law also
.