Navigation

Home
Issues & Papers
My Writings
My Music
My Photo Portfolio
Travel Schedule
Administrivia
Random Bytes
blogTrivia
Pop
Byte.org

 

See Also
Tucows
ICANN
R'rar Constituency
My Hotlinks...
My Yahoo!
ICANNWatch
ICANN Blog
Slashdot
That Nasty Site
NewsHub

The Archives
October 2002
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    
Sep   Nov

Send Me Email

All the news that's... whatever.

Welcome to Random Bytes...

Friday, October 18, 2002
 
Cohen on ICANN    Demys is running part I of a three part interview with Jonathon Cohen... "There's nothing like being quoted to remind you of what you've said - most of us don't expect to be recorded and to have what we said at a given time put to us; I think it's very useful for people to understand the implications of what they're saying as they say it."    12:09:34 PM
Defensive Registration Not Adding Up    I wasn't going to blog this, but if their denial is true and Siebel is simply making a technology announcement next week at their developer conference (BillG is keynoting), then why did they register siebelmicrosoft.com and other variations last Monday? And I thought the days of defensive squatting were behind us.    10:09:44 AM
Call me a Cynic, but...    

On 3 October 2002, the DNSO Names Council voted to initiate the policy-development process that will likely be used by the GNSO to examine the issues and make policy recommendations concerning deletion of gTLD registrations. The notice of initiation has been posted on the DNSO website and the attendant issues paper will be available for public comment until November 5, 2002.

As a big believer in the maxim that if one isn't part of the solution, they are part of the problem, I volunteered to assist in the drafting of the issues paper (truth be told, NC Chair and Registrar Rep to the NC, Bruce Tonkin did the lion's share of the work). I'm also a big believer in "wait and see how things work out", but I can't see how this highly compressed schedule can produce well considered and reasonable recommendations, especially when one considers that the TF is required more to gather input and data and required less to consider what the recommendations should be - the Names Council now has this responsibility. This very small group of people that makes up the Names Council has very little time to consider the limited details and input gathered by the task force and recommend what the new policies and processes surrounding the deletion of names should be.

As I said, I will wait and see whether or not this process can produce valid results - I will be taking bets in the meantime however. Current odds are 5 to 1 against :)

    8:26:36 AM

 

© Copyright 2003 Ross Wm. Rader. The opinions expressed in this weblog are solely those of the respective authors.
Last update: 1/27/2003; 11:36:16 PM.