Fri, 22 Nov 2002 17:07:51 GMT
"Do as I say, not as I do" says Lego in
this Wired piece. While its perfectly acceptable for a corporation to
abuse the intellectual property of a culture, its completely another thing
when the culture "abuses" the
corporation's intellectual property. I'll never figure some of these
things out. I wonder what RIAA would have said if Fanning had stated that he
would "continue to welcome viewpoints from both sides of the argument" and
would be receptive to reasonable requests from RIAA regarding Napster's use
of their intellectual property. I can't wait for the first lawyerly person
to tell me I'm off-base because "its a different situation".
Post a comment